
Questions and Answers About
the Ford Community and Performing Arts Center.
Where is the Center?
Get
Point-to-Point Driving Directions Here.
Dearborn residents overwhelmingly supported
a $23.8 million bond proposal in 1996, but I know the Center
costs $43 million. What are the additional amenities that we're
getting at the center?
A more versatile theater, for one.
At the time of the bond proposal, which was based on a consultant's
feasibility study for a new civic center, it was thought that
the city would just build a basic auditorium.
But after extensive input from a broad array of community groups
and a review of available finances, it was decided Dearborn
would best be served with a 1,201-seat theater equipped to host
both our outstanding local groups and professional entertainers.
Also added were the 200-seat Studio A performance area, scenery
shop, loge and balcony seating, orchestra shell with rigging,
loading dock and lobby enhancements.
The cultural arts portion of the center was also upgraded in
response to widespread public requests, including a permanent
display art gallery.
Importantly, enhancements were added to the recreation features
so that the center would serve residents' needs for years to
come. Among the additions were the outdoor pool terrace; deck
improvements, a climbing wall to safely challenge the adventurous,
an aerobics room and an underground sprinkler system to ensure
the outdoor athletic fields stay in top form.
Improvements to the appearance of the overall site, as well
as upgrades to the senior center, are reflected in the completed
building.
That all sounds great. But where did the
additional money come from?
Additional financing has come from savings accumulated
over the years in the city's budget and from other accounts
that are appropriately related to the center. For instance,
savings in the senior citizen operating fund were used to upgrade
the senior citizen area.
Also used were funds earmarked to upgrade amenities for the
old Civic Center. These funds pay for playground equipment;
land development; maintenance; and lighting, road and water
projects. A grant from the Michigan Council for Arts and Cultural
Affairs grant was also in the mix, as was a federal grant designated
for emergency operations, since the facility could serve as
a temporary shelter following severe weather.
In addition, under the late Mayor Michael A. Guido's initiative,
the non-profit Dearborn Community Fund was created to raise
money in support of the center. Its capital campaign has set
a goal of $10 million. So far, more than $7 million has been
pledged, including $5 million from Ford Motor Company.
Why didn't the city ask for the full $43
million at the time of the bond election?
In 1996, the old Dearborn Civic Center needed
extensive repairs to continue to operate. Yet, ongoing discussions
with a broad array of recreation and cultural arts groups indicated
that new, more modern amenities were needed, amenities that
could only be offered in an extensively renovated facility.
At this point, the late Mayor Michael A. Guido and the City
Council decided to see if Dearborn residents would support a
special bond issue to renovate the old Civic Center. If not,
they would have had to reinvest in the existing facility.
So, they put before voters a package that included many of the
basic amenities citizens were asking for.
Voters overwhelmingly supported the $23.8 million bond. But
discussions continued with the community. These discussions
involved making further refinements to the project, refinements
that would take the facility beyond its original scope. It was
obvious that there was widespread support to make this new complex
something very, very special.
Given this demand and this support, City leaders worked long
and hard at developing a financial plan to include the desired
amenities (outlined in a previous question), using the already
approved bond amount as the major element of that plan. They
were successful. Altogether, this has resolved in a $43 million
center.
It is important to note that despite these beneficial enhancements,
the cost of the bond to build the center has not changed. It
is still about 11 cents per day for the typical Dearborn household.
How was the fee structure established
for the aquatics/fitness center?
In creating the rates, the goal was to set appropriate
user fees for Dearbornites who will regularly visit the facility,
while being responsible to all city taxpayers, some of whom
may visit the Center for other activities and entertainment,
but not take advantage of the aquatics/fitness center.
Careful study went into the fees established for passes. As
part of that study, the city looked at other similar facilities
around the state of Michigan.
For example, the fee for a Dearborn family under an "Option
B" pass costs $564 ($47 a month).
Compare that cost to an annual pass for a family
at the Battle Creek Civic Center, which is $700, or at the Downriver
YMCA, which is $720. And, the YMCA facility is only 31,920 square
feet, compared with the 198,000 square feet of the Ford Community
and Performing Arts Center.
There are facilities in other communities with lower fees for
residents. However, those communities have opened their fitness
and aquatics centers to non-residents, who pay significantly
higher rates, which help to offset the operational costs. The
Center is designed for the benefit of Dearborn residents and
their guests.
What happens if someone misbehaves at
the Center?
The Recreation Department has established
a "Zero Tolerance" policy for disruptive behavior.
That means the Recreation staff will take quick disciplinary
action, including evicting people from the facility, should
a problem occur. In order to maintain the facility in its desirable
condition and keep its family focus, the staff has the backing
of the Mayor and the City Council with this policy.
It is also hoped that the users of the facility will feel some
sense of responsibility to keep the center in its clean condition
and preserve its inviting atmosphere.